r7p9pv
1947 critic literar, eseist, romancier, poet literary critic, essayist, novelist, poet
Lecturi moderne, eseuri, Bucuresti, Editura Cartea Romaneasca, 1978; D.R.
Popescu. Monografie critica, Bucuresti, Editura Albatros, 1983; Civilizatia
romanului. Eseu despre romanul universal, Bucuresti, Editura Cartea Romaneasca,
vol.I - 1983, vol. II -1991; Totdeauna toamna, roman, Bucuresti, Editura Cartea
Romaneasca, 1988; Viata pe fuga, roman, Bucuresti, Editura Sirius, 1997;
Invatarea lumii, poeme, Bucuresti, Editura Fundatiei Luceafarul, 1998;
Platonia, roman, Bucuresti, Editura Cartea Romaneasca, 1999; Timpul celor
alesi, roman, Bucuresti, Editura Univers, colectia Ithaca, 1999; Catre o cultura
legala virtuala, eseuri, New York, Transnational Publishers, 2001.
Modern Readings, essays, Bucharest, Cartea Romaneasca Publishing House,
1978; D.R.Popescu. Critical monograph, Bucharest, Albatros Publishing House,
1983; The Civilization of the Novel: A History of Fiction Writing from Ramayana
to Don Quixote. An essay on comparative literature, Bucharest, Cartea Romaneasca
Publishing House, vol.I -1983, vol. II - 1991; Always in Autumn, novel, Bucharest,
Cartea Romaneasca Publishing House, 1988; Life on the Run, novel, Bucharest,
Sirius Publishing House, 1997; Apprehending the World, poetry, Bucharest, Luceafarul
Foundation Publishing House, 1998; Platonia, novel, Bucharest, Cartea Romaneasca
Publishing House, 1999; The Time of the Chosen, novel, Bucharest, Univers Publishing
House, 1999; Toward a Cyberlegal Culture, essays, New York, Transnational Publishers,
2001
Mirela Roznoveanu aduce in literele romanesti trairi si experiente
noi, ceva surprinzator si care nu s-a mai scris inca. Aduce, nu o data,
amaraciunea trecutului nostru recent, dar si o privire transanta si o intransigenta
morala ce tin de verticalitate si de asimilarea unui mediu profund democratic
ce respinge jumatatile de masura. Pe de alta parte, romanele Mirelei Roznoveanu
sunt romane adevarate, in sensul ca ofera cititorului acea lume de imposibil
care il obsedeaza si pe care nu o poate trai decat prin intermediul
jocului fictional. La acest "continut" incitant se adauga eleganta
si rafinamentul unei scriituri atente la mixtura perceptiilor, la meandrele
sensibilitatii si la complexitatea relatiilor umane. (Dan Cristea)
Mirela Roznoveanu brings to the Romanian letters surprising feelings and experiences,
about which no one has written so far. She has evoked the sorrows of our recent
historical past from a critical and a moral perspective, whose origin can be
traced to her innate integrity. The circumstances of her present life, in the
midst of a deeply democratic social environment, where people have little or
no use for half measures, have also contributed to her intransigent vision.
On the other hand, Mirela Roznoveanu's books are genuine novels in that her
readers satisfy their craving for living in an otherwise obsessive and unattainable
world by attending to the intricacies of her fictional games. Her writing adds
distinction and refinement to such a problematic. Roznoveanu's prose is alive
with her capacity of capturing the logic of perceptions, the fluctuations of
sensibility, and the complexity of human relationships. (Dan Cristea)
Platonia este o carte foarte frumoasa. Am retrait nelinisti ale propriei mele
adolescente, scaldat intr-o nostalgie de o intensitate pe care nu credeam
ca o mai pot trai. Suntem persoane diferite la varste diferite, dar multi
dintre noi ucid si ingroapa pe cei care au fost in trecut - de aceea
este remarcabil sa citesc o carte in care nimic nu pare sa fi fost uitat.
Iar cititorul se indragosteste, desigur, de Platonia. Desigur, autorul
trebuie sa o omoare cata vreme mai sunt doar cateva clipe inainte
de Decembrie 1989 (care ar fi eliberat-o sau nu ar fi eliberat-o pe Platonia)
si acest fapt subteran mareste patosul pe masura. Am citit ca Tolstoi a fost
nesigur pana aproape de final daca sa o omoare pe Anna sau nu. Sa se fi
intamplat la fel cu Mirela? (Andrei Codrescu)
Platonia is a very beautiful book. I relived some of the torments of my own
adolescence and bathed in the nostalgia of an intensity that seems so far away.
We are truly different people at different ages, but most of us kill or bury
these people - so it's remarkable to read a book where nothing seems forgotten.
And the reader does, of course, fall in love with Platonia. Of course, the author
had to kill her since it's only a few moments before December 1989 (which might
or might not have freed her) and this subterranean fact increases the pathos
measurably. I read that Tolstoy was unsure until the very end whether Anna was
going to die. Perhaps Mirela too? (Andrei Codrescu)